Abstract
As a literary technique fragmentation serves unique cultural missions within America and Uzbekistan even though the purposes differ across both nations. etkin gereksiz bölünme anlatılmeleri aracı olarak hizmet verir ve modernist ve postmodernist Amerikan edebiyat akımlarıyla yakın ilişkiye sahiptir. Authors Don DeLillo and T.S. Eliot together with William Faulkner use fragmented plots and stream-of-consciousness techniques to both fight absolute truths and critique their contemporary societies. Through fragmentation Uzbek literature allows writers to move through historical changes and cultural turbulence as well as national identity conflicts. Post-Soviet authors Isajon Sulton and Togay Murod employ fragmented narrative structure and shifting narrative perspectives which explore historical memory along with collective identity dynamics while Soviet-era authors Abdulla Qodiriy and Chulpon used fragmented storytelling to show how tradition clashes with modernity.A comparative study demonstrates how fragmentation functions in several aspects between the two literary traditions. The literary technique of fragmentation operates differently in Uzbek literature since it links historical moments whereas American fiction often applies it to explore both doubting existence and identity loss. This research investigates how literature displays cultural history through an analysis of the different ways fragmentation appears in both contexts.